Erika Oserotaki is an artist from the
Matsigenka community of Palotoa
Teparo, in the Manu Biosphere
Reserve of the Peruvian Amazon.1 She and other artists from her
community are part of a project2 that promotes the development
of traditional weaving and spinning
using natural fibers and that seeks to increase the recognition of the
artistic practices of the Matsigenka
people. Erika holds onto a Shipibo-
Konibo embroidery—a circular piece
of cloth —that she bought from an
artist from that community when
she participated in a workshop she
led in another area of Manu. The
work, made up of interconnected
and overlapping lines, is one of
the starting points of the Palotoa
Teparo collective’s initiative. They
feel inspired by the work of the
women creators of the Shipibo-
Konibo people and take them as an
example. Today they are working to place their works of art into the
commercial circuits of traditional art
in Peru and also so that their people
are recognized for their artistic labor
in other spaces of creation.
Shipibo-Konibo artists—such as Olinda Silvano, Lastenia Canayo, and Sara Flores—are currently being recognized for their artistic work and their role as activists in their towns and communities. This recognition comes from within the Peruvian Amazon itself, from other Indigenous peoples of the Amazon, and also from national and international spheres. Their creations use different materials and techniques, such as ceramics, embroidery, textiles, and paint—whether with natural dyes, acrylics, or other materials. The works of this group of women creators stand out due to their contributions to traditional arts, as well as their participation in contemporary art circuits at the local and global level. Furthermore, the artists of this community participate in training and education programs for other peoples of the Peruvian Amazon and are taken as a model for developing a creative tradition that is valued and recognized.
Elena Valera (Bawan Jisbe) (Iparía, Ucayali, 1963), a Shipibo- Konibo artist, participated, along with other Indigenous artists, in a group of exhibitions that took place in Lima in that late 1990s. These exhibitions brought together works made with natural dyes— some on natural fibers such as llanchama—and other materials, that represented Amazonian flora and fauna, as well as the customs and modes of life of the peoples of this region. The works included traditional elements, such as the kené of the Shipibo-Konibo people, as well as words or phrases in Indigenous languages that describe, in a precise way, what is represented. In contrast, a few decades later, the artist Chonon Bensho (Santa Clara de Yarinacocha, Ucayali, 1992) developed a series of embroideries and paintings affirming the search for balance and interconnection among the diverse elements that coexist in the Amazon’s ecosystems and the world in general, such as plants, animals, and humans. Bensho’s work starts from the need to propose new ways of understanding our relations with the territory and other beings in the context of the global environmental crisis. Her approach is based on knowledge of healing through master plants, the protector spirits of plants and animals, and the wisdom of contemporary Amazonian mythology.
Both artists, in different periods of work, develop their proposals based on their knowledge of their family tradition—the wisdom of their grandparents—representing elements of flora and fauna to propose going beyond the Western understanding of the landscape, memory, and knowledge. This affirms the need to recognize ourselves as part of the territory that we inhabit and its cycles and processes. In their works, it is possible to analyze the changes in the presence and role of kené, as well as its diverse techniques and means of composition.
Archaeological research carried out over the last decades has found ceramic material created by
Shipibo-Konibo people between 1300 and 1500 AD in the archaeological site El Zapotal in the Pacaya
Samiria National Reserve,3 today the territory of the
Kukama Kukamiria people. In one of the objects found,
apparently a large polychromed plate, it is possible to
recognize representations of the “great mythical serpent,
owner of the universe in Amazonian cultures.”4 It is
Ronin, the serpent whose body contains all the kené, the
geometric designs painted by this community.
The Shipibo-Konibo term kené means “design”
and its plural is kenebo. Peruvian anthropologist and
researcher Luisa Elvira Belaunde explains that “the
word is used to designate the geometric patterns made
by hand on a variety of surfaces such as people’s face
and skins, outer walls of ceramics, and the fabric used
in clothing, accessories, and blankets.”5 The activity of creating kené, whether in painting, embroidery, or
weaving, “is a typically feminine art, taught by mother
to daughter, using varied materials [...] It is in great
demand in the growing Amazonian tourist market and provides women with a considerable degree of economic independence over their husbands.”6 Moreover, for the Peruvian artist Christian Bendayán,
“the origins of these designs are uncertain and their
meanings enigmatic, but it is undoubtedly a way of
writing memory and it demonstrates the deepest
manifestation of their identity, spirituality, creativity,
and sophisticated artistic sensibility.7 The kené designs
are part of pictorial compositions, embroideries, and
ceramic creations of the artists of the Shipibo-Konibo
community, which, over the last two decades, have
undergone transformations in their research and
creation processes. In recent years, this kené has become
a pattern that accounts for the interconnection between
diverse natural, human, and nonhuman elements and
that enables artists to emphasize the need to recognize
the value of community knowledges and to rethink
contemporary modes of life.
At the end of the twentieth century and the beginning
of the twenty-first, Amazonian Indigenous artists
started increasingly to participate and be recognized in Lima’s art spaces. In particular, Shipibo-Konibo,
Huitoto, Bora, and Ashaninka painters, with the support
of different institutions and managers, produced
pictorial representations that were later included in
different exhibitions.8 These artists’ paintings were
characterized by containing a “narrative composition
[...], representing spiritual beings and scenes and, at
the same time, through figures, recounting stories or explaining aspects of cosmovisions and shamanic
visionary states.”9 These works can be understood as a
vindication of the Indigenous voice against the Western
tradition of representation of the Amazonian territory—
for example, in botanical studies, pictorial landscapes,
and photographs made by travelers, European
researchers, and later by the Amazonian cultural elite in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Although in some cases they maintain features and structures of
Western representation—such as the study of elements
of flora and fauna or landscapes that emphasize the
vastness of the territory in relation to the beings that
inhabit it—these paintings reaffirm the value of the
knowledge of the Indigenous peoples to which they
belong. They do so by including terms in Indigenous
languages, stories originating from the collective oral
tradition, and representation of what is currently
identified as the cosmovision of their communities: the
spaces of the water beings, earth, heavens, divinities,
and protector spirits. Furthermore, they integrate the
rhythms and vibrations of the healing ceremonies with ayahuasca medicine or the spaces for sharing and
preserving knowledges that come from grandparents,
such as the maloca.10
It is in this context, in which Amazonian Indigenous
creators painted to share their people’s knowledge, that the work of Shipibo-Konibo artist Elena Valera
emerges. Between 1998 and 1999, she was accompanied
and supported by the Andean Rural History Seminar (SHRA)11 and was part of the process of the
development of what Pablo Macera identifies as “a new
pictorial style in Peru.”12 According to Macera, this was
the time of the introduction of a form of Indigenous
painting, the result of intercultural dialogue, that
critiqued the hierarchies between what was identified
and differentiated as “academic art” and “popular art.”
Elena learned the work of painting, embroidery,
and ceramic primarily from her grandmother’s teachings
and, to a lesser extent, from other family members. Her knowledge of processes of dying, drawing, and the design of her compositions comes from that family
knowledge. “I remember that when I was a girl my
grandmother embroidered fabrics and made ceramics.
That ceramic had a design and I would help my
grandmother draw it. We would also make animals, that
we created with earth”13 Regarding her processes for
creation during that period, she also comments: “First
she would dye raw white fabric with bark and then she
would apply mud to it so that it was black. Then my
grandmother would grab charcoal or a piece of white
earth and with that she would draw a design so that I could learn by seeing that drawing, so that I could
embroider with needle and thread, to practice.”14
Her most important process of learning about
and experimenting with natural dyes occurred during
the time that she participated in SHRA workshops, in
which she worked with achiote, huito, and Amazonian
colored earth. “Doctor Pablo Macera contracted me
to do a test, then I painted. Before working on that
painting, I had gone to get the natural dyes from the Pisqui River, which is very far. I have gotten different-
colored earth from there: yellow, red, brown, white,
medium dark brown, everything there was.”15 In 1998,
Elena participated in SHRA’s intercultural workshops
and developed, along with the Shipibo artist Roldán
Pinedo (Yarinacocha, Ucayali, 1971), a group of
canvases dyed with mahogany and other natural dyes,
and a series of representations of Amazonian fauna.
In 1999, those were included in the exhibition Telas
pintadas shipibas (Shipiba Painted Fabrics), curated by María Belén Soria, and held in the Temporary
Exhibition Hall of the Art Museum of the National
University of San Marcos. The animals represented in
those canvases served to transmit particular ideas of
Shipibo-Konibo Indigenous knowledge, human nature
prior to animals and plants in the Amazonian territory,
and their identification as protector spirits or figures of
Amazonian mythology. During those years, Elena and
Roldán “preferred to paint animals because, as they say,
they have autonomous souls and lives just like people
(joni). According to the Shipibo cosmovision, in ancient
times, animals had a human appearance and their name
carried the idea of the joni into which they were going
to transform.”16
Among others, this group of paintings includes Ino (1998–99) and Huiso Ino (1998–99), two representations of a feline or jaguar, and a black feline, respectively, titled with their names in Shipibo-Konibo. Both animals, in each of the compositions, appear accompanied by a frame of branches and leaves, and are depicted from a lateral perspective. These spaces delimited by elements of the Amazonian flora that enclose the views toward the river are characteristic of the Amazonian pictorial tradition of the twentieth century. If you look closely, you notice that the lines marked on the branches are very similar to those of the jaguar’s body: the spots on the feline body have a very similar form to the leaves in the external landscape. In other words, it is as if animals and plants respond to the same patterns, have the same nature, demonstrating the shared identities and affinities.
Elena connects these two paintings with very specific moments
from her memory: the process of learning from her grandmother
during her childhood. For her, those early experiences in the
Amazonian territory marked her subsequent form of inspiration:
“That painting was made because [...] I lived with my grandma in the
faraway high mountains, where there were not any people, it was just an encampment when I was very little. We would
cross ravines until we reached the field, we would see
many animals, many birds that sang, many monkeys
crossed the path. So I remember this and grew up with
that memory, with those visions, and therefore I have
painted wildlife.”15
The huiso ino, or black puma, is a character
whose history is associated with the destruction of the
Amazonian forests due to logging and the exploitation
of different resources, such as petroleum. Mythological
beings or protector spirits like him, which represent the
bond between the human and the animal, are at risk of
disappearing because of the devastation of the Amazon.
In an oral narrative recovered by Roldán and Elena, the presence of this feline and its relation with other
forest beings is analyzed: “That was in that time, when
the forests had not been destroyed by loggers. Now the
black puma almost doesn’t exist because loggers have
come in to take the wood, and the black puma could be in the depths of the high mountain because nobody
goes there. Something mysterious always exists in that
place, such as the mother of snakes, the mother of all
the animals, the mother of the trees, enchanted spirits;
because the jungle always has its enchanted spirits that
protect it.”17
Elena uses the kené designs to compose her signature in the lower left corner of her paintings. These contribute to creating an identifying element that emphasizes her Indigenous kinship, along with the animal’s name written in Shipibo-Konibo. In this way, she names them based on her own language, continuing a—usually Western—tradition of the study and identification of Amazonian fauna, but, this time, in her own voice. The kené coexists with the image of this being and sustains Elena’s identity as an artist. In these works, it is possible to recognize a practice that is connected to the artist’s personal experiences and, at the same time, with broader concepts about the ways of understanding the world that originate in the Amazon. Elena concentrates on the representation of Amazonian flora and fauna—a constant theme in the artistic tradition of the region—but seeks to emphasize the spiritual dimension, other modes of relating with the natural surroundings, and establishing connections between diverse beings and knowledges of her community.
Chonon Bensho studied in the Eduardo Meza Saravia
Artistic Training School in Pucallpa, graduating in 2018. Her learning process was marked by her interest
in bringing together the lessons learned in her family
and community with her academic training at the
school. Her educational experience enabled her to find
her own path for expressing her ideas. She also follows
the healing tradition of her ancestors, highlighting the
lessons learned from her grandfather: “We practice like
my grandfather practiced, in a very ancient way. He
didn’t just treat people, but rather he had to see if that
person really wanted to be cured or not.”18 In recent
years, the artist has carried out ethnographic research on
members of her own family accompanied by the work
of the writer and researcher Pedro Favaron. All of this
has enabled her to get closer to traditional knowledge,
an inheritance from her ancestors, and has been a major
influence on her current artistic practice.
When thinking about the training of Shipibo-
Konibo artists, Chonon emphasizes the uniqueness of
the knowledge transmitted by each family, regardless
of their belonging to a particular Indigenous people:
“Each family has their own way of teaching their
grandchildren, their children. Each woman had her
experiences, her ways of teaching. And, one goes
about learning and creating their own style from all
these mixtures.”19 Additionally, she highlights the
importance of a search for technical perfectionism
starting in childhood or what she describes as “doing
well”: “We had to do things well. Once, I made a piece of pottery that was a little crooked and my
grandmother grabbed it and threw it. Later, she told
me I had to do it again. And the same thing with
embroidery. If the backside of the embroidery was not
good, you had to go back and undo it and embroider it
again until the whole thing was correct.”20
In her work, Maya Kené (2018), using the technique of
embroidery, Chonon represents a pyramidal composition divided in
three different levels. These include: the world of water; then, that
shared by humans, plants, and animals; and, third, the world of the
heavens, with the moon, the sun, and a triangular representation
with clear references to the Christian Trinity. This structure is
marked by lines that interconnect with a series of leaves, without
beginning or end. The Maya kené, or circular design, is made with a type of embroidery more widely known as kano and “that, like the healing songs, advances by turning, and particularly takes it shapes from the winding serpentine paths of the Amazonian
rivers that have always been the main form of communication and
transportation between towns.”21
In the case of this work, the kené connects
everything. Creating a parallel between plants and
natural elements, the lines of the kené model the form of
the leaves, the course of the water, and the movement
and vibration of all beings. The kené constitutes the
structure of the composition and supports the different
levels that constitute it: “The Maya kené is the circular
kené, which unites all the elements that surround it respecting the trees and the plants. They are all united and the question is whether or not we respect
that.”19 Chonon thus emphasizes the interconnection
between the different elements and how the harmonic
coexistence around the tahuari, a large tree that
represents peace and calm for the artist, is presented in the center of the embroidery. In front of the tree, a
feminine figure holds one of its flowers, highlighting
the connection between humans and plants. The work
constitutes a representation of the spiritual space of
coexistence between humans, plants, and animals,
supported and framed by the river and the forest.
The embroidery’s composition is symmetrical, showing a series of dualities, such as the feminine and the masculine, the sun and the moon, the horizontality of fish and the verticality of trees, and is composed based on the artist’s desire to achieve a balance: “The arrival point is the search for that balance. It is the balance that should exist, complementariness, dialogue, and respect.”20 This is based on the “harmonious tension” between opposites (Bensho and Favaron) that is a fundamental part of this embroidery. Likewise, the pyramidal composition establishes a dialogue with another drawing, made by Juan de Santa Cruz Pachacuti Yamqui Salcamayhua, in 1613, that deploys the same structure to represent the Incan cosmovision. The artist used this image as a reference. The drawing includes a cross and also shows, in the upper part, the duality between the sun and the moon, and, in the central part, between man and woman. For Chonon, including the triangles in reference to the Christian Trinity is a way of reclaiming that dimension of her own spirituality. On the other hand, the representations of the heavens in the work account for the elements that have an influence on the interconnected beings in the composition: “The sun illuminates and nourishes the planets, the moon allows us to see in the midst of the darkness and shines for everyone, so that we can all see.”20
In Maya Kené, Chonon proposes a view of the Amazonian
territory in which all beings are interconnected and that is the basis for
the development of the knowledges of Indigenous peoples. In the work,
the characters dialogue and form a balance, whose alteration would
leave us without a future and dehumanize us little by little. She explains
it as follows: “That is why I believe that there cannot be Indigenous
people, nor Indigenous art, nor ancestral knowledges, without
territory. Disconnecting ourselves from the territory would mean
losing what sets us apart as a people from the rest of society organized
under the idea of the nation-state. Territory is our past, it is our
present, and if we want to continue being Shipibo-Konibo, it must also
be our future. And I think the same thing can be said about humans as a
whole since human beings are part of nature; if we continue destroying
the environment, motivated by our greed, we will continue getting sick
and dehumanizing.”22
In her paintings at the end of the twentieth century, Elena Valera represents Amazonian fauna and shows a distinct way of understanding the relationships between beings—the fluidity among the bonds of humans, plants, and animals—related to the knowledges of the Shipibo-Konibo people to which she belongs. Her felines, made with natural dyes, appear surrounded by the shapes of plants that frame the image and account for a shared nature. Chonon, two decades later, uses kené designs to emphasize the balance between beings that coexist in the Amazonian territory through a symmetrical and pyramidal composition.
Although their life and learning experiences have been very different, both artists recognize the value and importance of traditional knowledge preserved by their ancestors. Elena first represents the particular nature of the beings in the Amazon and identifies them with terms from the Shipibo-Konibo language. Chonon, later, represents a spiritual space shared by plants, animals, and humans, in which kéne is a unifying element. Finally, in both cases, through their works, the artists demonstrate the urgent need to protect the Amazonian forest in order not to lose the possibility of establishing dialogues between the diverse beings that inhabit it, in more physical dimensions and in spiritual terms, that constitute fundamental exchanges for conversation and the development of the knowledges of Indigenous peoples.